Wednesday, 17 October 2007
LFF: Eastern Promises
Am I the only one who misses the old David Cronenberg? That’s not to say I didn’t love A History Of Violence (I did), but watching the Canadian filmmaker’s latest, the London-set, Russian mafia-centric Eastern Promises, I found myself pinning for the Cronenberg of Scanners, The Brood, Videodrome, even The Dead Zone, all of which I found more affecting than this flawed thriller. Sure there’s plenty to send squeamish viewers hiding behind their hands — throats are slit, fingertips clipped off, and a switchblade poked in an eye — as well as another extraordinary performance from History star Viggo Mortensen. But Eastern Promises feels like compromised Cronenberg not the work of the transgressive, body obsessed director who once had James Woods insert a living, breathing videotape into a vagina-like slit in Debbie Harry’s stomach. Written by Dirty Pretty Things’ Steve Knight, the movie centres on midwife Anna (Naomi Watts) who pockets the diary of a young Russian prostitute who died in childbirth, then asks restaurant-owner/crime boss Semyon (Armin Muller-Stahl) to translate it in order for her to track down the girl’s family; a decision that has life-changing repercussions for all concerned. Touted for its bone-crunching bathhouse battle between Mortensen’s tattooed, naked Nikolai and two Chechen rivals, the film, as you’d expect from Cronenberg, is impeccably crafted, but Knight’s script, which has someone walk out of a central London hospital with a newborn baby hidden in a bag, feels a little obvious, too concerned with exacting moral retribution and tying everything up in a cozy bow.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
This is released in my corner of the world this Thursday... I have a few rostered days off stored up at work, so I've taken the day off to go check it out as I'm a big Cronenberg fan. Fingers crossed I'll enjoy it. I got very much into A History of Violence, but I too miss the corporeal, oozing Cronenberg of yore.
Let me know what you think...
Alright, saw this today.
I actually quite enjoyed the film overall. I would agree, however, that there were numerous script-level problems, mostly concerning the integration of Naomi Watts' Anna to the world of the film. Most of her scenes (and especially the ones concerning only her and her family) felt part of another movie, and it's no wonder Cronenberg seems more interested in the world of Nikolai and Kirill. Which was a shame, as Watts gave a fine performance, but for me Anna never really seemed to cross the line I felt she needed to in order to genuninely seem as neck-deep in the proceedings as she should have. The ending was something of a letdown also; not terrible, mind, but a bit too easy, maybe?
Having said all that, I did still thing it was pretty solid. Not brilliant, but good. But, save for a few scenes, it never really felt like a Cronenberg and, as previously mentioned, the old Cronenberg is something I miss too.
The ending's definitely "easy". Then again, I felt the same about the Steve Knight's last film, Dirty Pretty Things. I really liked it right up until the last scene in the car park with "we clean your toilets... etc" dialogue.
I agree entirely. I still very much like Dirty Pretty Things, but that whole spiel at the end... silly.
Post a Comment